Cross-education of wrist extensor strength is not influenced by non-dominant training in right-handers.

Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia. Institute for Sport, Exercise and Active Living, School of Sport and Exercise Science, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia. Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia. Melbourne School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK. La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia. D.Kidgell@latrobe.edu.au.

European journal of applied physiology. 2016;(9):1757-69
Full text from:

Abstract

PURPOSE Cross-education of strength has been proposed to be greater when completed by the dominant limb in right handed humans. We investigated whether the direction of cross-education of strength and corticospinal plasticity are different following right or left limb strength training in right-handed participants. METHODS Changes in strength, muscle thickness and indices of corticospinal plasticity were analyzed in 23 adults who were exposed to 3-weeks of either right-hand strength training (RHT) or left-hand strength training (LHT). RESULTS Maximum voluntary wrist extensor strength in both the trained and untrained limb increased, irrespective of which limb was trained, with TMS revealing reduced corticospinal inhibition. CONCLUSIONS Cross-education of strength was not limited by which limb was trained and reduced corticospinal inhibition was not just confined to the trained limb. Critically, from a behavioral perspective, the magnitude of cross-education was not limited by which limb was trained.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Randomized Controlled Trial

Metadata